Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology

Volume 145, Issue 5, November 2013, Pages 1026-1034
Gastroenterology

Original Research
Full Report: Clinical—Liver
The Hepatitis B Vaccine Protects Re-Exposed Health Care Workers, But Does Not Provide Sterilizing Immunity

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.07.044Get rights and content

Background & Aims

Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) can be prevented by vaccination with HB surface (HBs) antigen, which induces HBs-specific antibodies and T cells. However, the duration of vaccine-induced protective immunity is poorly defined for health care workers who were vaccinated as adults.

Methods

We investigated the immune mechanisms (antibody and T-cell responses) of long-term protection by the HBV vaccine in 90 health care workers with or without occupational exposure to HBV, 10−28 years after vaccination.

Results

Fifty-nine of 90 health care workers (65%) had levels of antibodies to HBs antigen above the cut-off (>12 mIU/mL) and 30 of 90 (33%) had HBs-specific T cells that produced interferon-gamma. Titers of antibodies to HBs antigen correlated with numbers of HBs-specific interferon-gamma−producing T cells, but not with time after vaccination. Although occupational exposure to HBV after vaccination did not induce antibodies to the HBV core protein (HBcore), the standard biomarker for HBV infection, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells against HBcore and polymerase antigens were detected. Similar numbers of HBcore- and polymerase-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were detected in health care workers with occupational exposure to HBV and in patients who acquired immunity via HBV infection. Most of the HBcore- and polymerase-specific T cells were CD45RO+CCR7CD127 effector memory cells in exposed health care workers and in patients with acquired immunity. In contrast, most of the vaccine-induced HBs-specific T cells were CD45ROCCR7CD127 terminally differentiated cells.

Conclusions

HBs antigen vaccine-induced immunity protects against future infection but does not provide sterilizing immunity, as evidenced by HBcore- and polymerase-specific CD8+ T cells in vaccinated health care workers with occupational exposure to HBV. The presence of HBcore- and HBV polymerase-specific T-cell responses is a more sensitive indicator of HBV exposure than detection of HBcore-specific antibodies.

Section snippets

Study Cohort

Ninety health care workers were studied for humoral and cellular immune responses 10−28 years after a documented complete course of HBsAg vaccination. Seventy-one health care workers had received recombinant HBs vaccine (Engerix B or Recombivax), and 14 health care workers had received a plasma-derived HBs vaccine (Heptavax). For 5 health care workers the vaccine type was unknown. This immunological analysis was part of a larger recall study of HBsAg vaccinees conducted in the Liver Diseases

HBsAg-Induced Antibody Responses Correlate With HBs-Specific T-Cell Responses But Not With Time After Vaccination

Ninety health care workers were studied 10−28 years after a documented full course of HBsAg vaccination. Anti-HBs levels were determined by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and HBs-specific T-cell responses by ELISpot. Fifty-nine of 90 (65%) health care workers displayed anti-HBs levels above the clinical cut-off of 12 mIU/mL. About one third of both the anti-HBs−positive and the anti-HBs−negative groups tested positive for HBs-specific IFN-γ−producing T cells (Figure 1A). The anti-HBs titer correlated

Discussion

In this cross-sectional study, we showed that 65% of health care workers who had received a full course of HBsAg vaccination during adulthood maintained anti-HBs titers above the clinical cut-off of 12 mIU/mL 10−28 years after primary vaccination. We assessed the impact of occupational HBV exposure with an exposure score, and by quantitating exposure-induced T-cell responses against HBcore and HBVpol, which are not part of the HBsAg vaccine. This allowed us to draw 3 main conclusions.

First,

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Elenita Rivera for excellent study support as well as all patients and healthy volunteers for participating in this study. The authors also thank James Schmitt, Occupational Medical Service, National Institutes of Health, for discussion and information on the HBs vaccine.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Hepatitis B and Health Care Workers

    2021, Clinics in Liver Disease
    Citation Excerpt :

    Guidelines for some European countries use a cutoff of 100 mIU/mL, rationalizing this cutoff based on the fact that it is higher than the levels usually seen in the rare situation of an HBV carrier with concurrent positive HBsAg and anti-HBs.25 The evidence-based data supporting an anti-HBs cutoff of 10 mIU/mL or more seems to be more reasonable, particularly in settings in which HBV prevalence is low.25,26 CDC recommendations for postexposure management of HCW based on HBV vaccination status is presented in Table 2.3

  • European survey of hepatitis B vaccination policies for healthcare workers: An updated overview

    2020, Vaccine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our study most countries (12 out of 18) had adopted 10 IU/l as a threshold, compared to 13 in our previous study, while 6 preferred 100 IU/l. Working with a 100 IU/l threshold has the advantage of being usually above the levels measured in HBV carriers with concurrent serum HBsAg and anti-HBs [3,25] and a meta-analysis concluded that available data did not allow to exclude an increased risk for infection with time since vaccination [27]. But recent research has confirmed previous studies that a level of ≥10 IU/l confers a long-term (10–28 years) immunity in immunocompetent individuals that have adequately responded to a primary HBV vaccination course, even in the absence of HBV exposure [28,29]. Therefore, current recommendations state that no boosters are necessary in immunocompetent individuals that have adequately responded to a primary HBV vaccination course [25].

  • Hepatitis B Vaccines

    2017, Plotkin's Vaccines
View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding This study was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health intramural research program. JMW was supported by grant We-4675/1-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Bonn, Germany.

View full text